Svitolina - Andreeva: betting tip (cf 1.75) and bets on the match of the Final WTA Tournament

Top bets from an expert
Фаворит по модели (60.1%), справедливый кф 1.67. Победная серия — Мирра Андреева: 4 побед подряд


Command Analysis

At the start of the debut Final tournament, Andreeva clearly outlined her claims to achieve maximum results. Mirra defeated Svitolina 6-4, 6-0 in the first round. It so happened that in the final we will have to play against the Ukrainian again. Subsequently, Andreeva dealt with Sobolenko and Schneider without a single set in the group, and in the semifinals she broke Pegula's resistance (6-3, 6-4). The key to Mirra's successful game is the desire to play aggressively, not to expect mistakes from her rivals, plus excellent physical fitness.

Svitolina was absolutely unable to match Andreeva in the first round of the group stage, losing 4-6, 0-6. This defeat was clearly a decent blow, because then Elina snatched difficult three-set victories from Mukhova and Sobolenko. Moreover, she defeated Noskova in the semifinals (6-2, 6-1). Experience helps the Ukrainian tennis player decently, because in 2018 she won the Final tournament.
Tip and bets
At the start in Indian Wells, Andreeva defeated Svitolina with an eight-game advantage. Undoubtedly, after that setback, Elina has added, she has three victories under her belt. However, it cannot be said that Mirra slowed down, on the contrary, she felt confident in her own abilities, when exchanging blows on the back line, she is definitely not inferior to Svitolina, and she is able to play more effectively on her serve. We believe that the Russian tennis player will win the title at her debut Final tournament.
Our betting tip is Andreeva's victory with a handicap (-3.5) of the game with a coefficient of 1.75
Betting predictions stat
Explore all statisticsMatch statistical model
How does it work?

Trends
The Totalbetis less than 2.5 sets
Svitolina scored all four victories in Indian Wells with an accurate score of 2-0 in sets.
Bet Effectiveness of sets: 1>2
This was the scenario that unfolded in two of the three face-to-face meetings.




