Mattia Bellucci - Hamad Medjedovic: prediction (cf 2.51) and bets on the Auckland ATP match

Emilio Nava
USA
ASB Classic, Qualification
Finished2 : 1
31-й сет6
62-й сет4
63-й сет3
stas-panarin
Stas Panarin
Site expert
30 days+0=0-0
ROI0.0%
Стас
Listen
Emilio Nava - Jan-Lennard Struff
Mattia Bellucci and Hamad Medjedovic will meet in the final of the qualification tournament in Auckland on January 11. The only face-to-face match between the tennis players remained for Medjedovic. How will the upcoming match between them turn out? - the bets for this match are in our betting tip

Command Analysis

Emilio Nava

Bellucci scored a victory over Jeffrey Blankano in the first round of qualifying for the Auckland tournament. The 24-year-old Italian finished the match in two sets (6-3, 6-4). Last season, Mattia's stats on the hard court were ten wins and 13 losses. During his career, the tennis player has won ten trophies – last year he won the challenger in Sumter.

Jan-Lennard Struff

In the first round of qualifying at the Auckland competition, Medjedovic broke the resistance of Dalibor Svrchina – the 22-year-old Serb confidently won the match in two games (6-1, 6-4). It should be noted that Hamad had a parity on the hard court last season – six wins and six losses. Last year, Medjedovic became the winner of the Oeiras competition.

Tip and bets

TipBellucci's victory
2.51

There is practically no difference in class in this pair. This is evidenced by the only face-to-face match between tennis players, which took place in a tight struggle. We think that both one and the other tennis player can win in this pair, so we suggest giving preference to Bellucci – they give a more attractive coefficient for his victory.

Our prediction is that Bellucci will win by a factor of 2.51

Will the prediction win?

Betting predictions stat

Explore all statistics
Total tips13
% of profit0.61%
Win percentage61.54%
Average coefficient1.82
Wins61.54%  (8)
Refunds15.38%  (2)
Loses23.08%  (3)
Total tips27
% of profit0.47%
Win percentage44.44%
Average coefficient1.78
Wins44.44%  (12)
Refunds11.11%  (3)
Loses44.44%  (12)
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Details are in the Personal Data Processing Policy