Elena Rybakina - Iga Schwentek: betting tip and bets on the Cincinnati WTA match

Command Analysis

With enviable stability, Rybakina makes her way to the semifinals at the third consecutive American hardball tournament. However, she hasn't been able to make a move and play in the finals yet. In Washington, she lost to Fernandez, and in Montreal she lost to Mboko. On the courts in Cincinnati, Elena played three matches in three sets, with Sarasua, Mertens and Keys. In the quarterfinals, she faced world number one Sobolenko and won an easy victory with a score of 6-1, 6-4.

Schwentek is hosting only the second tournament in the American Hardball series. In Montreal, Iga unexpectedly lost to Towson in the 1/8 finals (6-7, 3-6). She was able to improve on the courts in Cincinnati and made it to the semifinals. The Polish tennis player played only three matches on the grid, Kostyuk passed without a fight in the third round, who withdrew from the tournament. Schwentek defeated Potapova, Kirst and Kalinskaya without losing a single set. It should be noted that two years in a row before that, the former first racket of the world had covered the racket in Cincinnati just at the 1/2 finals stage.
Trends
The Totalbetis less than 2.5 sets
In two of the last three face-to-face matches, Rybakina and Schwentek did not exchange sets they won.
1.481st setbet: total more than 9.5 games
This bet was played in three of Rybakina's four previous matches in Cincinnati.
1.76Tip and bets
Schwentek gets the status of a favorite from the bookmakers, which is hard to agree with. Clearly, Rybakina has now gained decent shape, as evidenced by her confident victory over Sobolenko the day before. Elena consistently works out on her serve, she can offer Ige a decent pace when exchanging punches. We believe that the chances of reaching the semifinals in this pair are largely equal, and according to the quotes provided, we recommend betting on a representative of Kazakhstan.
Our betting tip is that Rybakina will win with a handicap of (+3) games with a coefficient of 1.69


























