Lyudmila Samsonova as Jessica Busas Maneiro. Betting Tip for the Wimbledon match

Samsonova and Busas Maneiro will meet in the fourth round of Wimbledon on July 7. Samsonova is confidently moving through the London Major tournament bracket - in two sets she beat all her rivals, including Daria Kasatkina. Will Lyudmila be able to deal with Busas Maneiro as easily? - the bets for the upcoming match are in our betting tip

Command Analysis

Liudmila Samsonova

Samsonova confidently beat Daria Kasatkina in the third round of Wimbledon. Lyudmila seized the initiative from the first games, actively went on the attack and almost did not give the Australian a chance to counterplay (6-2, 6-3). In the second round, the Russian scored a victory over Yulia Starodubtseva. In the first round, she beat Marion Ruan from Australia.

Jessica Bouzas Maneiro

Busas Maneiro defeated Dayana Yastremskaya in the third round of Wimbledon. The Spaniard started the match confidently, taking the first set with only one game lost, but then she slowed down a little and lost the second game. In the decisive set, Jessica rallied, regained stability on serve and put the squeeze on her opponent in the end (6-1, 2-6, 6-3). Earlier, she beat Sofia Kenin and Ella Seidel in the tournament bracket.
Trends
IT Busas Maneirobid- more than 8.5
Busas Maneiro has won more than 8.5 games in 6 of the last 7 matches
1.91Bet Busas Maneiro with a handicap (+1.5) of a set
Busas Maneiro won with a handicap (+1.5) in sets in 6 of the last 7 matches
2.22The Totalbetis less than 18.5
Samsonova has played less than 18.5 games in her last 5 matches.
2.41Tip and bets
Samsonova is in excellent shape at the moment - on the way to the fourth round, the Russian did not lose a single set. And on the eve of Wimbledon, she reached the semifinals at a major tournament in Berlin, where she beat Osaka, Pegula and Anisimova. Given this, we expect Lyudmila to handle Busas Maneiro without any problems.
Our betting tip is that Samsonova will win with a handicap of (-5) games for a coefficient of 1.93