Olga Danilovich - Yulia Starodubtseva: betting tip for the WTA match Bad Homburg

Olga Danilovich and Yulia Starodubtseva will compete in the decisive match for the right to compete in the main draw of the tournament in Bad Homburg on June 22. From our betting tip, you can find out which of the tennis players has a better chance of winning today. Which confident bets should I choose for the match?

Command Analysis

Olga Danilovic

Danilovich performed well on clay, scored the third round of Roland Garros, and played in the final in Rouen. However, the Serbian tennis player's transition to grass was unsuccessful. In Nottingham last week, she lost to Yastremskaya at the start (4-6, 6-7). The start of qualifying in Bad Homburg was not easy for Olga. In two hard-fought sets, we managed to beat the far from the most formidable German Schunk (6-4, 7-5).

Yulia Starodubtseva

Starodubtseva, like her upcoming opponent, was marked by the third round of Roland Garros and unsuccessfully played in the first grass tournament. In Ilkley, Yulia failed the opening match against Snigur (6-3, 0-6, 0-6). As part of the tournament in Nottingham, she did not qualify, got a chance to play in the main draw as a lucky loser, but it did not help – she lost to Buksa (3-6, 3-6). At the start of qualifying in Bad Homburg, Starodubtseva had some problems beating Dyachenko (3-6, 6-3, 6-1).
Trends
The Totalbetis more than 2.5 sets
In three of Starodubtseva's previous five matches, the maximum number of sets was played.
2.40Bet Effectiveness of sets: 2>1
This is how events unfolded on the court in Danilovich's three previous fights.
2.21Tip and bets
Starodubtseva plays with big swings, she can completely fail entire sets, as it was in the duel against Snigur. Danilovich is more stable in this regard. In general, she is showing herself better in the season, we think that today it is the representative of Serbia who has more chances to break into the main draw.
Our betting tip is that Danilovich will win with a handicap of (-2.5) games with a coefficient of 1.74